Ah right, that makes sense (the flac part), cheers for explaining.prowler5150 wrote:You absolutely can buy music in FLAC format. The format is "free" as in a license fee is not needed to use it.The Plotblocker wrote:You don't buy Flac. It means FREE Lossless Audio Codec. Just get Winamp and set it to rip your CD's in Flac and presto, you have "lossloess".
HD Tracks suck. They do not get special access and just enhance the CD version. I fell for their shit once and bought the MJ Bad album from the, and it sound fucking awful compared to the original 80's standard CD and Vinyl pressings.
The high-res retailers do not just enhance the CD version. In a way, they do get special access - the record labels give them hi-res versions of the music different from the CDs or MP3s. If music purchased from the hi-res retailers (HD Tracks, Pono, Qobuz) "sucks" from a sound quality perspective, it usually is the fault of the record label, not the retailer. If the record label provides the retailer with hi-res files that use a bad mastering or clearly contain 16/44.1 "data," there isn't much the retailer can do. (You could say the retailer shouldn't sell something as hi res that isn't objectively "better" than the CD, but this very quickly becomes a subjective argument.) If you are interested in hi-res music, you have to do your homework before purchasing. It sucks, but that's the way it is. This issue really isn't any different than the loudness wars of which AB has become a casualty - the industry doesn't place a priority on those of us who want dynamic, hi-res music. The quality depends entirely on the mixing/mastering/production and the people involved.
The 2015 Rush remasters and the 2015 Van Halen remasters (in 192, not 96) are definitely better than any of the CDs. Listen to Steven Wilson's stuff on Blu-ray and tell me the guy doesn't know how to deliver dynamic music that really *sounds* amazing. Opeth's Pale Communion on Blu-ray is a reference for sound quality. After hearing those, imagine how good AB would sound if done properly (for one thing, Flip's cymbals probably wouldn't sound like jingle bells...).
As for the HD Tracks. With the 2 I mentioned, you are right again, it is definitely the fault of the label (in this case Sony, and probably the Michael Jackson Estate too) as for the Bad album, instead of handing over the original tapes, which they still have, they gave them the extremely compressed and ruined multitracks from the Bad 25 reissue.