DUST - The Second Part
- Timotheus
- Little Belgian Waffle
- Posts: 16842
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 3:52 am
- Location: Belgium シ
- Contact:
Re: DUST - The Second Part
I think 2016 makes a lot of sense.. Wasn't really expecting them to release something earlier when I first heard about Dust.
Last edited by Timotheus on Fri Mar 27, 2015 1:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
anguyen92 wrote:Oh well. Deal with it.
Re: DUST - The Second Part
How does disagreeing with a release date (which is an opinion btw) equate to a sense of entitlement?
- Timotheus
- Little Belgian Waffle
- Posts: 16842
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 3:52 am
- Location: Belgium シ
- Contact:
Re: DUST - The Second Part
I don't see how this is going to damage the band.. I think releasing the albums really close to eachother would damage the band more so.
anguyen92 wrote:Oh well. Deal with it.
Re: DUST - The Second Part
There should be at least a 6 month gap between the two imo. If you're only waiting like 3 months, might as well release everything all at once. This method gets hype going for the summer/fall tours, and Dust will get things going if they do more shows next year.
anguyen92 wrote:Oh well. Deal with it.
Re: DUST - The Second Part
Well it's good to know what the plans are anyway rather than the more hazy stuff of before. I'm more interested in how they'll price them rather than when the second's released, Mark's said to think of it as a second disc to the album but are they both still going to be full price albums on their own? Either way, releasing 20 songs within a year is fairly awesome.
So if Slash and the Conspirators stick to their previous 2 year cycle, we could get Tremonti 2.5, AB5 and Slash 3 in the same year? Carnage.
So if Slash and the Conspirators stick to their previous 2 year cycle, we could get Tremonti 2.5, AB5 and Slash 3 in the same year? Carnage.
For all of the hope that it brings...
Re: DUST - The Second Part
@JSlade -
I have read your posts for a while now.. Constructive criticism is fine - you are just being negative to be negative and that doesn't help anyone.
Disagree with something if you want to - Dislike something if you want to - that is totally fine but don't call art work that Dan worked hours and hours on "Shit". I personally have worked very hard to bringing the band to this board for direct input from the die hard fans - when you conduct yourself in this manner what do you think that does for the overall vibe?
I have read your posts for a while now.. Constructive criticism is fine - you are just being negative to be negative and that doesn't help anyone.
Disagree with something if you want to - Dislike something if you want to - that is totally fine but don't call art work that Dan worked hours and hours on "Shit". I personally have worked very hard to bringing the band to this board for direct input from the die hard fans - when you conduct yourself in this manner what do you think that does for the overall vibe?
Re: DUST - The Second Part
Not sure why 2016 seems so surprising, after all if everything is "ready to release now" then why not just release Cauterize tomorrow and Dust in June (or on the same day, why not). With Cauterize releasing in June, I don't think it makes sense to release another album (even a "Part 2" type album) too quickly afterwards, or else it should just be a double album. A gap of about six months seems about right, and even if they aimed for six months exactly then the slightest delay would push it into 2016 (and considering Cauterize drifted from May to June not long after announcement it seems reasonable to expect something to push it back).
Re: DUST - The Second Part
TTournier wrote:@JSlade -
I have read your posts for a while now.. Constructive criticism is fine - you are just being negative to be negative and that doesn't help anyone.
Disagree with something if you want to - Dislike something if you want to - that is totally fine but don't call art work that Dan worked hours and hours on "Shit". I personally have worked very hard to bringing the band to this board for direct input from the die hard fans - when you conduct yourself in this manner what do you think that does for the overall vibe?
I am not being negative to be negative, I am voicing my opinion on decisions made by you guys.
Also, please show me where I called it shit, I would love to see where I said that.
However, I will refrain from coming to this board and posting from now on because apparently people cannot handle me voicing my thoughts.
Last edited by JSlade on Fri Mar 27, 2015 2:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Formerly Cthree921811
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 9:00 pm
- Location: You don't wanna know..
Re: DUST - The Second Part
They need to gap this out. I think 2016 is perfect for a pt.2
-Pt1 gets advertised
-Band Tours
-Pt1 comes out
-Have a big tour in support.
* things slowly die down*
BAMMMM TEASER #1 FOR DUST
-and the cycle continues. lol
-Pt1 gets advertised
-Band Tours
-Pt1 comes out
-Have a big tour in support.
* things slowly die down*
BAMMMM TEASER #1 FOR DUST
-and the cycle continues. lol
-
- Formerly Cthree921811
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 9:00 pm
- Location: You don't wanna know..
Re: DUST - The Second Part
UMM speaking from experience.. I would just let it go lolJSlade wrote:Please show me where I called it shit. I would love to see where I said that.TTournier wrote:@JSlade -
I have read your posts for a while now.. Constructive criticism is fine - you are just being negative to be negative and that doesn't help anyone.
Disagree with something if you want to - Dislike something if you want to - that is totally fine but don't call art work that Dan worked hours and hours on "Shit". I personally have worked very hard to bringing the band to this board for direct input from the die hard fans - when you conduct yourself in this manner what do you think that does for the overall vibe?
- Timotheus
- Little Belgian Waffle
- Posts: 16842
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 3:52 am
- Location: Belgium シ
- Contact:
Re: DUST - The Second Part
Even if he wanted to, he couldn't, because you edited that post
anguyen92 wrote:Oh well. Deal with it.
Re: DUST - The Second Part
What I said was "I won't lie, that art is ****ing gross." That is my opinion, which I am perfectly entitled to state. If you also look at my edit reason, it says that it's edited to avoid pissing people off, which is exactly what it did. Tim even got what he wanted (which happened before he got upset at me in that post because I edited long before he posted). I won't post criticism anymore to avoid people getting their feelings hurt.Timotheus wrote:Even if he wanted to, he couldn't, because you edited that post
Re: DUST - The Second Part
You're acting like a baby. Just let it go and move on........ I'm sure there is some reasoning behind the cover art that we will all come to know before or during it's release.... similar to the last album's artwork.JSlade wrote:What I said was "I won't lie, that art is ****ing gross." That is my opinion, which I am perfectly entitled to state. If you also look at my edit reason, it says that it's edited to avoid pissing people off, which is exactly what it did. Tim even got what he wanted (which happened before he got upset at me in that post because I edited long before he posted). I won't post criticism anymore to avoid people getting their feelings hurt.Timotheus wrote:Even if he wanted to, he couldn't, because you edited that post
Re: DUST - The Second Part
This isn't my board - so far be it from me to tell you to leave...JSlade wrote:TTournier wrote:@JSlade -
I have read your posts for a while now.. Constructive criticism is fine - you are just being negative to be negative and that doesn't help anyone.
Disagree with something if you want to - Dislike something if you want to - that is totally fine but don't call art work that Dan worked hours and hours on "Shit". I personally have worked very hard to bringing the band to this board for direct input from the die hard fans - when you conduct yourself in this manner what do you think that does for the overall vibe?
I am not being negative to be negative, I am voicing my opinion on decisions made by you guys.
Also, please show me where I called it shit, I would love to see where I said that.
However, I will refrain from coming to this board and posting from now on because apparently people cannot handle me voicing my thoughts.
your comment was on another page...
point being -
I am sure it is easy to sit back and judge what we are doing, thinking you know better - But do you push the doctor out of the way in the delivery room because you have seen an episode or two of ER?
Dude I was also sent 4 different screen grabs of you sharing the single to people before it was out.... so thanks for that as well. You obviously have the groups best interests at heart.
Re: DUST - The Second Part
Timotheus wrote:Even if he wanted to, he couldn't, because you edited that post
Totally - This.
Re: DUST - The Second Part
JSlade wrote:What I said was "I won't lie, that art is ****ing gross." That is my opinion, which I am perfectly entitled to state. If you also look at my edit reason, it says that it's edited to avoid pissing people off, which is exactly what it did. Tim even got what he wanted (which happened before he got upset at me in that post because I edited long before he posted). I won't post criticism anymore to avoid people getting their feelings hurt.Timotheus wrote:Even if he wanted to, he couldn't, because you edited that post
No you didn't.. I came to this site 5 mins before i posted - and there it was.
I am not upset, I am not pissy and I am not being mean. Stop lying.
If you love the band and love the music why would you steal from them and rip on them every chance you get?
come on dude - I am not asking for a million dollars, i am just asking for you to be cool.
Is that so hard?
Re: DUST - The Second Part
I have to agree here. There's a difference between being eager to hear your favorite band's new music, and disparaging the band out of impatience.TTournier wrote:some of these posts..... sense of entitlement much?
It's all in the way you say it. Everyone here is welcome to post their opinions. Just keep in mind that the words you choose make a huge difference in the way your opinions are perceived.
- The DIsposable Hero
- Bought The CDs
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 7:44 pm
Re: DUST - The Second Part
My thoughts on this whole back and forth right here, other than Tim straight up owning with his posts (high five to you man, you really deserve your just due), are that if you've got nothing nice to say, at least be polite. Manners matter. To quote Mark Tremonti's own lyrics,"watch your words or your words might drown you."
Regarding the album artwork, I was puzzled at first glance, but I don't think it's bad.
As for the Dust album, I think it's a better plan than releasing the songs on an individual monthly basis, and I think that will open up a lot of other doors for getting the Tremonti brand out there (guys, a tour supporting Dust would be fantastic!).
I obviously care if it would come out all the way in 2016, but it's not that much of a factor. I would just be happy for it to come out so we can all enjoy the songs!
So yeah there's my two cents.
Dakota C. (The Disposable Hero)
Regarding the album artwork, I was puzzled at first glance, but I don't think it's bad.
As for the Dust album, I think it's a better plan than releasing the songs on an individual monthly basis, and I think that will open up a lot of other doors for getting the Tremonti brand out there (guys, a tour supporting Dust would be fantastic!).
I obviously care if it would come out all the way in 2016, but it's not that much of a factor. I would just be happy for it to come out so we can all enjoy the songs!
So yeah there's my two cents.
Dakota C. (The Disposable Hero)
Hey there, I'm the guy who started the Mark Tremonti Tuning Master List. Check it out!
Dakota C. (The Disposable Hero)
Dakota C. (The Disposable Hero)
Re: DUST - The Second Part
^ High five buddy.
I took a note out of the Stone Sour book - I was working with them when the House of Gold and Bones part 1 and 2 came out - I thought it was a great idea and most importantly the fans got 2 solid years of content via Tours, videos, merch and singles.
We might release Dust as a stand alone record... we might release it so the art all works together (Ie. house of gold and bones).. we might do it one song at a time. time will tell
I took a note out of the Stone Sour book - I was working with them when the House of Gold and Bones part 1 and 2 came out - I thought it was a great idea and most importantly the fans got 2 solid years of content via Tours, videos, merch and singles.
We might release Dust as a stand alone record... we might release it so the art all works together (Ie. house of gold and bones).. we might do it one song at a time. time will tell
Re: DUST - The Second Part
Just as long as we get all 20 songs. because I love Tremonti and want all the music I can get!TTournier wrote:^ High five buddy.
I took a note out of the Stone Sour book - I was working with them when the House of Gold and Bones part 1 and 2 came out - I thought it was a great idea and most importantly the fans got 2 solid years of content via Tours, videos, merch and singles.
We might release Dust as a stand alone record... we might release it so the art all works together (Ie. house of gold and bones).. we might do it one song at a time. time will tell
Photobucket cash grab.